The Argument from Contingency | Got Questions | Published 2017
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 2:16 pm
3 KEY POINTS
from the article:
from the article:
Nothing we observe in the universe is necessary; nothing needs to exist, in and of itself.
We often observe things that cease to exist, falling victim to death, destruction, or decay. Eventually, all non-necessary things cease to be. But, if it were possible for everything to cease to exist, and if there has been an infinite amount of past time, then all things would have already ceased to exist. There would be nothing left at all.
The fact that anything exists at all, even now, means there must be one thing that cannot cease to exist, one thing that must necessarily exist. There must be one thing that is non-contingent—i.e., its existence is not dependent on anything else. This thing must be.
SEE THE FULL ARTICLE
gotquestions.org/Five-Ways-Thomas-Aquinas.html
gotquestions.org/Five-Ways-Thomas-Aquinas.html